Benedict XVI, the clarity of faith, unity for Catholics and a basis for dialogue between Jews and Is Fr Jaeger: “It is only by starting out from a firm knowledge of faith that inter-religious dialogue can be fruitful”. 19 April, 2005 ISRAEL - VATICAN Jerusalem (AsiaNews)

Jerusalem (AsiaNews) – The election of Benedict XVI is the biggest, indeed the only, consolation for the sorrow left in our heart following the death of John Paul II. This is what Fr David-Marie A. Jaeger, a Franciscan jurist in Israel, told AsiaNews about the appointment of the new pontiff. “This choice is fundamentally important especially for Catholicism,” he said, “because no one has known more than Ratzinger how to express and proclaim with clarity the faith of the Church.” According to Fr Jaeger, there is a focus on “a factor of recovered unity among all the faithful in Christ” all around this “clear” proclamation.

The religious is convinced that the solidity of the new pope’s faith will lend fundamental support to dialogue with other Christian denominations and with non-Christian religions, especially Judaism and Islam. The Franciscan, a legal expert covering relations between the Holy See and Israel, added that “it is only when starting out from a sure knowledge and acceptance of the same Christian and Catholic faith that we can hope for inter-religious dialogue which will bear fruit. Dialogue is not possible and it is not fruitful if participants do not have knowledge, awareness and a clear and complete conception of their own faith.”

As regards negotiations between the Holy See and Israel, under way for 13 years now, Fr Jaeger, who is close to developments at the negotiating table, says he is optimistic. “John Paul II did not have the opportunity to see the fulfillment of this really great initiative of his; however I hope Benedict XVI will be able to do so shortly.” Already years ago, the press had revealed that Cardinal Ratzinger was part of a select committee of cardinals with whom John Paul II would have consulted before deciding to sign the fundamental Agreement with the State of Israel in 1993. “I am confident because of this: Pope Benedict XVI will start to exercise his role already informed about the main problems and issues of relations with Israel, which I hope will be one of the matters which he will follow with attention with his curia.”

Further negotiations between the Vatican and Israel are under way at the moment.

Pope recalled for building bridge with Jews and Israel 4 April, 2005 Catholic News

Pope John Paul II will forever be remembered, among so many other things, as the Supreme Pontiff who both brought the relationship of the Church with the Jewish people to a whole new level, and who established diplomatic relations, and signed treaties, with the State of Israel.

Franciscan Fr David Jaeger, a member of the Vatican Delegation who negotiated, on behalf of John Paul II, the 1993 Fundamental Agreement with the State of Israel, said that the impact of the Holy Father on the perception of Jews was indicated by a 2000 poll that had the majority of Israelis declaring that he was their favourite candidate for Chief Rabbi of Israel!

"In just a very few days of presence on Israel's television screens, this particular Vicar of Christ completely transformed the whole approach that the majority of the Israeli public have towards the Church and to her leaders," he said. John Paul II, in effect, introduced the Israeli public to a whole new concept of faith and religion."

"In him, the Israeli secular majority saw something new: a religious leader who was not preaching nationalism, extremism, xenophobia, violent expansion, or theocratic clericalism, but universal charity, justice, mercy, inclusion, equality, liberty for all."

The signing of the treaties, on the one hand, and the enormous good will generated by the Pope's personal presence, on the other hand, together laid a solid foundation for the new relationship between the Church and Israel, and offered great hope for the future security and effectiveness of the Catholic Church in the Jewish State.

Fr Jaeger said that with the passing of John Paul II, the "great work that he began" still remains to be completed.

The Pope, the bridge with the Jews and Israel He was chosen as the most favourite candidate for Chief Rabbi of Israel. But the Fundamental Accord still needs a full implementation. 3 April, 2005 VATICAN - ISRAEL by David Maria A. Jaeger Jerusalem (AsiaNews)

Jerusalem (AsiaNews) - Pope John Paul II will forever be remembered, among so many other things, as the Supreme Pontiff who both brought the relationship of the Church with the Jewish people to a whole new level, and who established diplomatic relations, and signed treaties, with the State of Israel.

The impact of the Holy Father on the perception that Jews have of the Church, and on the popular imagination, is best illustrated by the public opinion polls published towards the end of his 2000 pilgrimage to the Holy Land: A great majority of Israelis who were interviewed declared John Paul II their favourite candidate for Chief Rabbi of Israel!

In just a very few days of presence on Israel's television screens, this particular Vicar of Christ completely transformed the whole approach that the majority of the Israeli public have towards the Church and to her leaders. John Paul II, in effect, introduced the Israeli public to a whole new concept of faith and religion. In him, the Israeli secular majority saw something new: a religious leader who was not preaching nationalism, extremism, xenophobia, violent expansion, or theocratic clericalism, but universal charity, justice, mercy, inclusion, equality, liberty for all.

Earlier, of course, in 1993, the Pope had signed the Fundamental Agreement with the State of Israel, and in 1994, had on that basis established full diplomatic relations with the Jewish State. Thus, 46 years after the establishment of the State of Israel, a systematic effort was begun to secure the legal position of the Catholic Church in the territory of the State of Israel.

The signing of the treaties, on the one hand, and the enormous good will generated by the Pope's personal presence, on the other hand, together laid a solid foundation for the new relationship between the Church and Israel, and offered great hope for the future security and effectiveness of the Catholic Church in the Jewish State.

With John Paul II being no more, the great work that he began still remains to be completed. For the extraordinary achievements of his personal presence in Israel - in 2000 - to be rendered permanently effective, the Church still has to be properly "implanted" within Hebrew-speaking Israel through a visible, distinct ecclesial subject, capable of engaging with all levels of society, in their own language, and from within their own culture.

The Church still has to show the Jewish people in Israel that she is present "within" and "among" them, as she is normally present "within" and "among" every nation and people.

Also, on the level of law and institutions, the Fundamental Agreement with Israel is still waiting to be put into effect. In its twelfth year now, it has still not been incorporated into Israeli law.

Moreover, the Fundamental Agreement was left incomplete on crucially important matters, namely the fiscal relationship of the Church to the State, and the security of the Church's religious property. Negotiations on these matters are still continuing at the time of the Holy Father's death.

Alas, he did not have the satisfaction of seeing his initiatives come to fruition completely, in this regard. In agreeing to establish full diplomatic relations with the State of Israel before a solution of some of the most basic practical questions regarding the security of the Catholic Church in the Holy Land, John Paul II acted with tremendous courage and foresight. He made an act of confidence in the future.

Above all, and specifically, he chose to place exceptional, extraordinary trust, in the other side to these negotiations. He trusted that the young State of Israel, having been granted full recognition and diplomatic relations, will respond, on its part, with full recognition of the rights and freedoms acquired by the Church in the Holy Land over many centuries.

At the time of John Paul II's death, the Church is still waiting - confidently - for this response. It is now for the State of Israel to confirm that John Paul II's truly extraordinary trust was indeed justified.

Israel, for its part, could do nothing more significant to honour the memory of this greatest friend of the Jewish People than to implement fully the Fundamental Agreement, his legacy.

* Fr. David Maria A. Jaeger, an Israeli, Franciscan friar and lawyer. He has been a member of the Vatican Delegation who negotiated, on behalf of John Paul II, the Fundamental Agreement with the State of Israel, signed on December 3rd 1993.

Veil of discretion over Holy See- Israel Meeting 1 April, 2005 ISRAEL - VATICAN (AsiaNews) by Yedidia Amato

Jerusalem (AsiaNews) The Delegations of the Holy See and of the State of Israel met once more on Thursday, 31 March, at the seat of Israel's Ministry of Foreign Affairs, and continued their negotiations aimed at implementing the 1993 Fundamental Agreement, through a "comprehensive agreement" on confirming the Church's tax exemptions, safeguarding Church property and securing the State's participation in funding the social and educational work of the Church on behalf of residents of the State. The meeting came shortly after the sixth anniversary of the start of this round of negotiations on 11 March 1999. Like every negotiation between the Parties since 29 July 1992, it took place within the framework of the Bilateral Permanent Working Commission between the Holy See and the State of Israel, which was established and announced on that date.

The meeting took place without any public announcement, and no official communiqué was published upon its conclusion. AsiaNews has learnt though that it lasted the full working day, unlike the previous meeting - on 16 February - which dissolved after only two and a half hours. According to veteran Commission watchers reached by AsiaNews the length of the meeting, that it lasted the whole day, means that the Delegations were engaged in serious work and were doing so in a purposeful manner. Other than that though, AsiaNews has not been able to gather any concrete information about the precise contents of the talks, or about whether - and what - concrete progress may have been achieved. A source close to the Delegation of the Holy See has explained to AsiaNews that the meeting was conceived as a part of a three day series, with the next appointments being scheduled for 20-21 April, and that the Delegations are likely to evaluate the series as a whole, while further meetings are also now certain to be planned for. The source also disclosed that the meeting took place in a "very cordial atmosphere," with both Parties sharing freely their concerns and their expectations.

Given that the negotiations have resumed and are apparently taking place in a friendly atmosphere, there is an expectation in Church circles here that the Government will soon amend its statement given to Israel's Supreme Court last year. At that time the Government officially told the Court that it does not consider itself bound by the 1993 treaty with the Holy See (the Fundamental Agreement). That statement was met with astonishment, and protests, on the part of the Catholic Church. Now it is hoped that, given the depth of the perplexity on the part of the Church, and the intrinsically inexplicable nature of the Government's statement to the Court, the Government will rethink its position and approach the Court once more with a different statement. It appears that the next hearing on this matter at the Supreme Court is scheduled for the end of June, so that Government ministers and lawyers still have some time to consider the matter and correct their mistake, probably a mistake made by low level legal personnel, unfamiliar with the Fundamental Agreement, and with the relationship between the Holy See and Israel, and completely unaware of the implications and repercussions of what they erroneously thought was just a routine legal brief.

Holy See, Israel delegations discuss agreement on Church status Jerusalem, Apr. 01 (AsiaNews)

Jerusalem, Apr. 01 (AsiaNews) - The delegations of the Holy See and of the State of Israel met once more on Thursday at the seat of Israel's Ministry of Foreign Affairs, and continued their negotiations aimed at implementing the 1993 Fundamental Agreement, through a "comprehensive agreement" on confirming the Church's tax exemptions, safeguarding Church property and securing the State's participation in funding the social and educational work of the Church on behalf of residents of Israel.

The meeting came shortly after the sixth anniversary of the start of this round of negotiations on March 11, 1999. Like every negotiation between the parties since July 29, 1992, it took place within the framework of the Bilateral Permanent Working Commission between the Holy See and the State of Israel, which was established and announced on that date.

The meeting took place without any public announcement, and no official communique was published upon its conclusion. AsiaNews has learned though that it lasted the full working day, unlike the previous meeting-- on February 16-- which dissolved after only two and a half hours. According to veteran commission watchers reached by AsiaNews the length of the meeting, that it lasted the whole day, means that the delegations were engaged in serious work and were doing so in a purposeful manner. Other than that however, AsiaNews has not been able to gather any concrete information about the precise contents of the talks, or about whether-- and what-- concrete progress may have been achieved. A source close to the delegation of the Holy See has explained to AsiaNews that the meeting was conceived as a part of a three day series, with the next appointments being scheduled for April 20-21, and that the delegations are likely to evaluate the series as a whole, while further meetings are also now certain to be planned for. The source also disclosed that the meeting took place in a "very cordial atmosphere," with both parties sharing freely their concerns and their expectations.